<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
<record>
  <controlfield tag="001">2753</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20160701171710.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.1051/epjconf/20134301004</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ASTROimport-910</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Grevesse, N.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Why GN93 should not be used anymore</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">We show why the solar chemical composition of [1] (GN93) and the similar values of [2] (AG89) and [3] (GS98), characterized by values of the metallicity of the order of 0.017 to 0.020, largely used in solar and stellar modeling, are now obsolete. They should be replaced by the new and more precise results of [4] (AGSS09), with a much lower metallicity of 0.0134. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Asplund, M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Sauval, J.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Scott, P.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="p">European Physical Journal Web of Conferences</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">43</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">2013</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">01004</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2013EPJWC..4301004G</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">published in</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">NONREF</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
</collection>