<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
<record>
  <controlfield tag="001">2673</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20160701171709.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ASTROimport-830</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lampens, P.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2005</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Are these observations really necessary?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">We draw the attention to some bright, double and multiple visual systems with long-period orbits currently lacking high-quality astrometric data and we present arguments for resuming astrometric observations of these apparently very classical systems. When - for any good reason - a thorough study of these is being undertaken, the importance of the coverage of the critical phases in the orbit by follow-up observations should once more be stressed. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Frémat, Y.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="p">Astrometry in the Age of the Next Generation of Large Telescopes</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">338</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">2005</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">276</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2005ASPC..338..276L</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">published in</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">NONREF</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
</collection>